NOW:53045:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
64°
H 64° L 50°
Cloudy | 10MPH
  • Print

Brookfield considers changes to development plan in advance of Trader Joe's

Dec. 14, 2011 | 4 comments

Trader Joe's grocery store may be making its long-awaited debut in Brookfield.

First, however, city officials will consider a number of changes to development plans for the Underwood Crossing retail center at the former Quebecor World Color site on Bluemound Road.

Plan Commission members on Monday discussed allowing about 6,000 square feet of additional retail space to accommodate a yet-to-be named junior anchor, as well as modifications to signage and lighting to accommodate requests of Trader Joe's and residential neighbors.

In July, the Common Council approved development plans for a 140,000-square-foot Target store and an 18,000-square-foot junior anchor directly to the east. An additional 16,200 square feet of commercial space will front Bluemound, with PNC Bank and Trader Joe's occupying two of three lots there.

Trader Joe's is a nationwide chain of specialty grocery stores. In Wisconsin, Trader Joe's has stores in Glendale and Madison.

More retail space

Tony Barranco, a retail development director with Ryan Cos., said a yet-to-be named "soft-goods retailer" could become the junior anchor tenant; however, it requires about 6,000 square feet of additional retail space.

"They are not a huge traffic-generating store. They're not like a dollar store, or other high-volume store, where they need a lot of repeat business," Barranco said.

Community Development Director Dan Ertl said the increase in square footage would add about 3.2 percent of additional retail space to Underwood Crossing.

Barranco said the change wouldn't impact a 75-foot landscaped buffer between Underwood Crossing and the Columbia Gardens neighborhood. However, several parking spaces would be lost.

Alderman Rick Owen, a member of the Plan Commission, said the additional square footage wouldn't have a major impact on the development.

"A particular junior anchor would be expanded in a way almost no one will perceive," he said. "I'm comfortable with the changes."

Plan Commission citizen member Kevin Wahlgren noted that the expansion would be restricted to paved space, rather than adjacent green space.

Plans originally called for a monument sign along Bluemound to carry the banner of Underwood Crossing, Target and the junior anchor.

Barranco said a sticking point in negotiations with Trader Joe's representatives is that a sign for the grocery chain be included in the monument sign.

"Trader Joe's loves signs," Barranco conceded.

Ertl said city code regulating signage allows only two businesses on a monument sign. Also, a sign carrying the name of a retail center (e.g., Underwood Crossing) must account for at least 50 percent of a monument sign space.

The proposed change wouldn't impact the height of the sign, but it would increase its surface area by about 60 square feet.

Ertl said the Common Council can approve a variance if a community benefit or goal is being achieved.

Commissioners expressed support for the variance, but also noted that the city's current signage codes may need to be re-evaluated for other locations.

"I very much support the amendment to zoning code to allow more businesses on monument signs," Owen said.

Lush landscaping

A representative of the adjacent Columbia Gardens subdivision has requested a more intensive landscaping buffer, rather than leaving the existing buckthorn and evergreens intact.

Ryan Cos. is under no obligation to do so under the current development agreement, Ertl said.

Barranco said more intensive landscaping isn't included in the project's budget; however, cost savings from changes to parking lot lighting could be allocated.

Currently, the maximum height of light poles allowed in the city is 20 feet. Ryan Cos. has requested a variance allowing 25-foot light poles. That would require fewer poles and save about $20,000.

Alderman Mark Nelson, a member of the Plan Commission, questioned why the city placed a 20-foot limit on light poles.

Larry Goudy, city zoning and building administrator, said the limitations were put into place for aesthetic reasons.

Alderman Gary Mahkorn, who serves on the Plan Commission, said there have been advancements in lighting technology that make taller light poles less obtrusive.

"I would like to see a little of that cost savings translate into more landscaping," he added.

The Plan Commission backed a public hearing required to amend development plans.

Next Step

WHAT: Common Council will consider authorizing a public hearing on proposed changes to development plans

WHEN: 7:45 p.m. Dec. 20

WHERE: City Hall, 2000 N. Calhoun Road

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50
  1. So when a major company comes in that can afford to spend money to make landscape changes comes in Brookfield does not demand changes. When someone wants to start a small business in the city Brookfield requires them to spend (me) to spend $30,000 dollars and let them hold on to an additional $12,000 for one year.

    Then when we expanded they wondered why we did not buy the lots adjacent to us to do so.
  2. Wis TaxPayer, don't forget, small sign also, we don't want people to know your business is here >:( Brookfield economic developement money , what a waste. :D
  3. WisTaxPayer,

    You have to accept the fact that while Brookfield may want you, they certainly do not need you. Try doing your business in a cornfield in Marquette county. I'm sure you would have no push back from the local governments.

    That said, I would love to see the Trader Joes open ASAP. Sure beats driving to Glendale.
  4. [b]Left Winger from Tosa,[/b] Yea, and if I did business in Marquette County I probably wouldn't pay $10K, $20K or more an acre in property tax for the privilege either. :-/

    Nor would I have an endless book of local regulations to follow and a complete lack of property rights upon which I could depend. :(

    If Brookfield doesn't need me, then why is it paying a fortune for a city planning department to peddle all of the developer's crackpot ideas to the masses? :o

    And why are they squandering the few remaining acres of revenue generating land on TIF protected developments? >:(

    Happy holidays! :D
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries