Practically Speaking
Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers' perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.
Tax the rich? Every job I had was because of rich!
The Democrats keep talking about taxing the rich as a solution to our deficits and debt. But it isn't that we don't tax enough; it is that we spend too much!
Most Democrats* don't want to extend the Bush tax cuts because they include tax cuts to the wealthy. They also think taxing the rich plays well to the middle and lower class. They ignore the fact that the lowest income levels get a 50% tax increase (the highest increase), and every other bracket increases too, once Bush's tax cuts expire.
Taxing the rich will have a devastating affect on small businesses, employment, and our economy. As Republican Senator Orrin Hatch said, "They can talk about the wealthy all they want, but this is about stopping a job-killing tax hike on small businesses during tough economic times."
It is true: You can't get a job from a poor person. Every job I ever had was because of a rich person--richer than me at least. If you have worked for a small business, I bet it is true for you too. Think about it.
Here is a quick list of my employers:
- Don's Super Value food store - Don owned the franchise. He employed maybe 70 locals and college students. I did cake decorating in the store bakery in my college days.
- Shorewood Village Bakery - This was an upscale, family owned bakery, where I cake decorated after college. They employed about 7 workers. Owners worked along side employees.
- Mullenbach's Fashions - A small custom bridal and ball gowns shop, owned by James Mullenbach. This was my 1st full time job after college where I was one of 7 workers. Little did I know the experience gained there would prove invaluable in my real job years later at Milwaukee Ballet.
- T.A. Chapman's Department Store - Golden Thimble Fabrics. Chapman's was an upscale department store, owned by a very wealthy Milwaukee family. They employed a few hundred people.
- The Snow Goose - a boutique on Jefferson St. where I designed and created custom clothing. I was the only employee. This business went under in less than a year.
- Elna Sewing Machine sales at Mary Lester Fabric Stores. The sewing machine sales area within the store was owned by a sole proprietor. I was one of maybe 3 employees besides the owners. They went under also.
- Milwaukee Ballet Costume Department. Here you might say, that is a non-profit arts job, not a small business. True. But if you look in the back of any program for the list of donors, you see if it were not for the donations and grants of wealthy patrons, the show would not go on. While I was there, the ballet company nearly went under several times.
So you see, had it not been for the rich, I wouldn't have had a job. Some of the rich business owners were barely making it themselves. Some worked right along side the employees. Some filed their business income on their personal tax return--they would be hurt by the Obama tax increase on incomes above $250,000.
In the case of dress designer Jim Mullenbach, no one worked harder, or longer hours than he did. Often he worked so late into the night, he would sleep on the cutting table after getting the work ready for the handful of employees for the next day. He knew if he didn't get the work done at night, his workers would have nothing to do the next day. Time is money and no owner can afford to have his employees sit idle while the owner prepares their work.
Most small business owners I know (20 or fewer employees) and the self employed, work long hours and endure times of plenty and famine. Plenty often means so much work that they have to work a 70 hour week. Small business owners hesitate to hire extra help because they don't know if there will be enough future work. That would be the famine--long stretches of little or no work coming in. They deserve the fruits of their labors--profits--without this new threat of higher taxes. ObamaCare taxes heaped another burden on these employers.
Obviously, none of the Liberal/Progressives spouting tax the rich understand the entrepreneur/small business owner and how they struggle to maintain cash flow and payroll. Maybe that is because they have so little private sector work experience.
Why do we care about small businesses? Because they create most of the jobs. The government defines small businesses as 500 or fewer employees. Until the recession and Obama's Stimulus, small businesses employed over half the workers in the U.S., about 60.2 million. Those 20 or fewer employers accounted for 1/3 of those workers--20.6 million. (Stimulus drastically increased the number of government employees--a drain on the economy.) The government Small Business Administration statistics web page tells us:
- Represent 99.7 percent of all employer firms.
- Employ just over half of all private sector employees.
- Pay 44 percent of total U.S. private payroll.
- Have generated 64 percent of net new jobs over the past 15 years.
- Create more than half of the nonfarm private gross domestic product (GDP).
- Hire 40 percent of high tech workers (such as scientists, engineers, and computer programmers).
- Are 52 percent home-based and 2 percent franchises.
Small business job creators are important. The key to turning our economy around is not increasing the tax rate on the rich or anyone, it is reducing the tax burden on employers and workers.
Next time someone says tax the rich as a solution to our red ink, think of what that means to the workers, the ones who were hired by those rich. That worker just might be you.
*Democrats are betting that ending tax cuts for the rich..."Republicans say the tax cuts are critical to bolstering a feeble economic recovery. And with unemployment at 9.5%, even some Democrats are queasy about raising taxes on high earners -- a category that includes many small-business owners -- when policymakers are trying to encourage them to create jobs."
Six Months to Go Until The Largest Tax Hikes in History
Majority of Small Business Sector Facing Higher Taxes Under Obama Plan
Links:
Brookfield7, BetterBrookfield, Vicki McKenna, Jay Weber, The Right View Wisconsin, Randy Melchert, Mark Levin, The Heritage Foundation, CNS News, Breitbart BigGovernment


34 COMMENTS
-

0
0
Click thumb to rate
0
0
Please login to rate
Perhaps, toaster, those 'powers' you speak of have looked at what you claim to be the 'truth' and have found no foundation to go further. You are a citizen, aren't you, so why don't you and the 'we' you speak of, take the matter to court. Put your money where is mouth is!
- Share
-
-

1
0
Click thumb to rate
1
0
Please login to rate
Dear SallyByTheMinute, I know that the vast majority of liberals want to keep their heads in the sand and pretend our national leader really is an Afro-American from Illinois. But it just ain't true!
- Share
-
-

0
0
Click thumb to rate
0
0
Please login to rate
Weren't the Bush tax cuts for the "rich" on personal income as opposed to business income? If that is, indeed, the case, the above argument is moot.
- Share
-
-

0
1
Click thumb to rate
0
1
Please login to rate
Policy rates are at zero.
- Share
-
-

0
1
Click thumb to rate
0
1
Please login to rate
Oi. I come to my hometown online paper to remind me of why I have to vote. "Closet Muslim," "Indonesian born president," and this is the best: "Trees do more damage than good in a residential community." There's just no cure for stupid.
- Share
-
-

0
1
Click thumb to rate
0
1
Please login to rate
It's already been shown that stimulus spending has brought back parts of the economy that have floundered.
- Share
-
-

1
0
Click thumb to rate
1
0
Please login to rate
Carpmeister, not being republican I really don't need to defend them, and I agree that no one is blameless for our economy. But, looking at Soetoro, Biden, Reid and Pelosi, do you honestly believe that any of these plastic characters have sufficient wit to lead us out of this mess?
- Share
-
-

0
1
Click thumb to rate
0
1
Please login to rate
Getting back ON-subject, here is a VERY interesting article from the WSJ Market Watch.
- Share
-
-

0
0
Click thumb to rate
0
0
Please login to rate
Say Kyle, in keeping with the eclectic nature of this blog posting, I thought I'd comment on the news today that our school district is revamping its web site to, among other things, "cater to prospective Elmbrook families in an effort to boost the district's sagging resident enrollment".
- Share
-
-

0
1
Click thumb to rate
0
1
Please login to rate
Imagine what Brookfield would look like, sound like and smell like without trees? It would look like an urban wasteland (think "Mad Max.") We'd have far more noise pollution than we have now--road noise, train noise without any buffers. It would smell like? Depleted atmosphere, without any C02? Doesn't the addition of the extra oxygen molecule convert carbon monoxide? (I'm not a chemist.) Trees are the "lungs" of the earth.
- Share
-
Load more comments View all comments Back to topBlack Swan - Aug 15, 2010 9:34 AM - Report Abuse
I just love how this started with taxes, then tree hugging and now to Obama's citizenship.
toasterRider - Aug 14, 2010 10:46 PM - Report Abuse
It would require far more than the 2000 character limit imposed by this blog to outline the case against Mr. Soetoro. So let's just let his pro-Muslim mantra speak for itself. You will know him by his fruits.
Should the powers that be really believe this claim to be so ridiculous, they could stop it in it's tracks, either in court or in Congress, with a short public examination of the record, a full and fair recital of the facts and a statement of the conclusions which inevitably issue from them.
That they have chosen not to, speaks volumes about the veracity of the claim made by those who honestly question Soetoro's native birth.
Should you or any of your hyper-liberal pals have any real evidence in denial of these claims, we will gladly examine them with you.
Until then I continue to remind you that our objection to Mr. Soetoro's claims to office rest nowhere other than on the requirements of the Constitution, the absence of facts presented to support his claim to natural born citizenry or to refute this solid objection to his Presidency.
You may not care about the requirements of our Constitution. But we do!
jshaw42 - Aug 14, 2010 5:01 PM - Report Abuse
garny1 - Aug 14, 2010 7:48 AM - Report Abuse
"Quantitative easing" doesn't solve anything, as all you're doing is debasing the currency, which in turn makes everything more expensive (or depresses wages - same outcome) and that in turn means that purchasing power decreases, which means that forward economic activity decreases as well.
fiscal stimulus is needed now, NOT monetary stimulas. Holding the Fed borrowing rate at 0% is a dangerous gamble.
SadByTheMinute - Aug 12, 2010 5:01 PM - Report Abuse
CarpieD - Aug 12, 2010 3:43 PM - Report Abuse
From the Moodys Analytics/Princeton report on the TARP: “While the effectiveness of any individual element certainly can be debated, there is little doubt that in total, the policy response was HIGHLY (my emphasis) effective,”
How is that not effective leadership? You obviously only wish to believe what you want to.
The so-called "Conservative" mantra of reduced taxes has not worked with ANY effectiveness, except to further beat down the middle and lower classes. Proven time and again. Until meaningful cuts are made (which I am for, despite your constant haranguing) the only way to cut deficits is through an appropriate tax policy.
Santas Elf - Aug 12, 2010 1:12 PM - Report Abuse
We've drifted too far from the shore and none of these jerks knows a thing about sailing the boat!
CarpieD - Aug 12, 2010 9:04 AM - Report Abuse
Perhaps several of you would like to rethink some of the past posts...
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/reagan-insider-gop-destroyed-us-economy-2010-08-10
No one is totally blameless for our economic problems as of late, but the ground work was laid LONG before this administration took office.
Santas Elf - Aug 12, 2010 7:06 AM - Report Abuse
This place is getting to sound ever more like a charter schools network. Perhaps we ought to make it just that by taking the whole shebang off of the taxpayer's backs and letting it fly or die on its own!
WG - Aug 11, 2010 3:20 PM - Report Abuse
I hasten to add that Mequon's overall property values are higher on average than Brookfield's, that the average sold home price is higher than Brookfield's, that property values in Mequon have held more stable than in Brookfield, and that the net property tax per thousand is less than in Brookfield. When I was home shopping before I moved here, the two choices were Brookfield and Mequon. After living here for 15 years, I'm sorry I didn't buy in Mequon. My taxes would have been lower for the same priced property, the school board didn't go on an unprecedented building spree (and hence, the debate about closing schools that Brookfield is now facing,) and the rate of commercial development has been reasonable, keeping Mequon a really nice place to live.