Practically Speaking
Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers' perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.
STOP the Obama & Doyle Waste-of-Money Train, Speak up Aug. 3
Yesterday, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and Gov. Jim Doyle visited Watertown, WI. They gleefully signed the papers in order to release $46.7 million out of the total $810 million dollar budget. That's Obama appointed stimulus money to build the rail line from Milwaukee to Madison.
For now, I will bypass the ridiculousness of spending that much money on a train that the majority of Wisconsinites don't want or need. What struck me was that LaHood sounded so giddy about making us create that rail line. LaHood said,"High-speed rail is coming to Wisconsin. There is no stopping it."
The Journal Sentinel's opening line of LaHood, Doyle say there's no derailing high-speed rail line ended by stating the duo "portrayed" the "...rail line as an unstoppable train that Republican gubernatorial candidates can't derail."
Candidates Scott Walker and Mark Neumann disagree. Both said that they would shut down construction if elected. That is a relief.
I caught a bit of Scott Walker on Jay Weber this morning. He reminded listeners of the supposedly unstoppable "Blue Shirt" at the airport! People said we couldn't stop that too, he said. Estimated operation costs are $10 million a year that Wisconsin taxpayers will have to fund. Walker said something to this effect, Bottom line, the Federal government cannot obligate Wisconsin to spend $10 million a year to support / run the train.
Mayor Tom Barrett supports the train. After all, he also wants his Folly Trolley in Milwaukee --another expensive form of transportation that no one will use. Walker also brought up the fact that This isn't just Jim Doyle's train, it's Tom Barrett's train too. He was there since the beginning.
So one thing Wisconsinites can do to STOP the Drain on the Taxpayer Obama & Doyle Express is VOTE REPUBLICAN!
But you don't need to wait until November. You can also speak up on Aug. 3rd.
My Alderman Lisa Mellone sent a notice that the City of Brookfield is holding "A city-wide public workshop regarding this proposal is scheduled on August 3rd from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. at Brookfield Elementary School, 2530 N. Brookfield Rd. We encourage you to attend and express your opinion on this issue.The Council will deliberate the placement of a train stop in Brookfield on August 17th."
She adds, "If you can’t attend the workshop, please give your alderman your questions and stance on the issue of High Speed Rail stopping in Brookfield before the 8/17 meeting."
All Wisconsinites should voice their opposition to their Aldermen, Mayors, State Representatives and State Senators. The operational funds come out of the transportation fund for the whole state, even though the train operates just from Milwaukee to Madison.
So, Taxpayers in Distress, speak up!
Listen to Vicki McKenna's Friday Show Hour 1 Part 1 She details the cost to ride, subsidies, and other horrors.
Hate the idea of a high-speed rail station in Brookfield? Blogger Cindy Kilkenny found a this nugget in the Brookfield Common Council packet: "1993 - Governor Thompson commits $50 million to build passenger rail between Milwaukee and Madison."
Boondoggle Charges Prompt Wisconsin to Move Rail Station
Links:
Brookfield7, BetterBrookfield, Vicki McKenna, Jay Weber, The Right View Wisconsin, Randy Melchert, Mark Levin, The Heritage Foundation, CNS News, Breitbart BigGovernment


5 COMMENTS
-

0
0
Click thumb to rate
0
0
Please login to rate
Santas Elf- you don't ride trains much do you ? Well I do. I ride the Hiawatha route from MKE to Chi. 75 min ride. Takes 15 min to get to the station from BField. Yes, I'm up early, but with wireless I work on the train. You see my office is in the Loop. It is a 1 1/2 hour total commute granted, but I'd rather train than drive. Having a stop in Bfield would be great, less driving to the St. Paul st. station. BTW, the 2 stops - Sturtevant and Glenview are roughly 2 mins each. I typically go 2 days/wk and the 10 trip tik is $16.00 each way.
- Share
-
-

0
1
Click thumb to rate
0
1
Please login to rate
God gave man the ability and knowledge to use this great gift of god. As it says in Locomotions 12:3, "Sitheth upon the metal serpent and thou shalt hath the will of the Lord to reach the ends of thy earth. Amen"
- Share
-
-

0
1
Click thumb to rate
0
1
Please login to rate
Trains, high speed or otherwise, are an excellent method of getting from point A to point B, IF there is infra-structure at points A & B to get passengers to their final destination, and I'm not talking about just a station. Elf makes a good point about the distance between stops for high speed rail. The current plan is akin to driving a car that goes 0-60 in less than 4 seconds on Bluemound at noon!
- Share
-
-

1
0
Click thumb to rate
1
0
Please login to rate
Sarg, as a fellow non-comm, allow me to interject a thought or two.
- Share
-
-

1
2
Click thumb to rate
1
2
Please login to rate
What's not to like about trains? No traffic jams, no construction bottlenecks, no watching out for other drivers or radar bears. Much nicer riding the train to Chicago than driving. Money? I didn't hear you squawking when the Iraq war started. Yes, that train will save me some serious money, I can dump this two ton energy pig.
- Share
-
Back to topgarny1 - Aug 20, 2010 7:17 PM - Report Abuse
Lord Brookfield - Aug 02, 2010 5:04 PM - Report Abuse
Black Swan - Aug 01, 2010 12:21 PM - Report Abuse
My wife and I use the train on trips to Chicago and we enjoy it. It's about break even price wise with driving for a day trip and a saver when we stay over night. It also has the added benefits the Sgt. points out It would be nice if we could get the train out here, but it would also be nice if I had a car that could go 0-60 in less than 4 seconds...
Santas Elf - Jul 31, 2010 4:58 PM - Report Abuse
First, while trains are great, they aren't very practical for daily jaunts. Unless you live across the street from one station and only need to get across the street from the other station, trains leave you in the dilemma of needing additional transportation to complete the trip.
Second, if you are depending upon the train for transportation to and from work, you've got to adjust your schedule to theirs. Say you work from 9 to 5, but the trains run at 7 and 7. That means you have to sit on your prat at work at least two hours longer each day than you would be payed for.
Third, while these trains are hyped as high speed rail, how fast are they going to be with three or four stops on a seventy mile trip when each stop probably eats up five minutes?
I very much like the use of mass transportation, especially when used to replace a ninety minute commute. But there are some serious trade-offs we're probably not yet discussing.
Happy Chelsea wedding day!
Sgt Fluffy - Jul 31, 2010 1:35 AM - Report Abuse