NOW:53045:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
12°
H 14° L 3°
Clear | 17MPH

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers' perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

Pre-primary Mayoral Forums: 1 down, 1 today, 1 Feb. 4th

City of Brookfield, Elections, Elmbrook, Special events

Click for 4 photo version.

Last week Tuesday, the CCC held the first of 3 pre-primary Mayoral Candidate Forums. CCC president Barbara Roncke moderated.

True to form, candidate Tom Schellinger canceled that day but managed to get his campaign literature there. BrookfieldNOW reporter Alan Harmari blogged live from the event.
I took notes and a few pictures too--see below.

At 6:30pm tonight, the Greater Brookfield Chamber of Commerce and NOW Newspapers are hosting a forum at the Safety Building. Again, NOW reporter Hamari will be blogging live from the event. This is good news since I will be at the Creation Science presentation tonight. At least I can still catch the highlights of the forum. (Candidate Tom Schellinger will not be at tonight's forum due to a conflict with a County Board meeting.)

There is still one more forum to go before the primary election on February 16th. That one will be at 7pm at City Hall and hosted by the East Central Branch of the Waukesha County Republican Party.

A few tid-bits and pics from last week's forum: Answers are not exact quotes but will give you a flavor of the evening.

About 50 people attended the CCC forum, including (alphabetical order) Aldermen Berg, Carnell, Lowerr, Mahkorn, Lisa Mellone, Jerry Mellone, and Nelson. State Assembly candidate David Coon was also there. Questions were from the CCC board.

Mayor Jeff Speaker was first to give his 3 minute intro. He said he wanted to make City Hall friendlier--cut the red tape and make the process easier. He asked for our vote because we have a lot to do... He said Brookfield is a premiere neighborhood to live in, work in, and eat in. He emphasized the good places to eat!

During the questions, one of the more ironic moments of the night was how the mayor answered part 2 on the question of an economic recovery plan for the vacated property on Bluemound.

Q: How do you justify construction [of new] buildings next to vacant property? Speaker answered, we don't have much of that but there are some successes: CVS and that "other" [Hooters] restaurant. The irony was that the Common Council just had a public hearing on adding an additional free standing building to the parking lot of the Brookfield Fashion Center, that is across the street from vacancies at the 3 neighboring shopping centers! To be fair, I understand this out building was approved years ago under the original zoning.

The other humorous comment to me was in response to the question of density and uniform height criteria for target areas. The mayor said he didn't want "cookie cutter development" that looks alike! To me, most of Brookfield's development looks alike: formidable, with no charm. The false 2nd story requirement comes to mind too.

Former Alderman and School Board member David Marcello was next. Primarily, he directed listeners to his website to read comments from those on the school board. He said government is most frustrating when it's misunderstood, and often it is on purpose to obscure their intentions. He added that his strength on the school board was to speak in words that can be understood.

The first question was about an interchange on Calhoun Road. Marcello was the only candidate to point out how unusual it is for an interchange to be in a residential area.

Another question was about south side residents being treated rudely when contacting City Hall and what you as mayor would do to make sure staff was courteous? Marcello relayed an incident when he was Alderman that revealed he was threatened by the Director of Administration. Marcello said there were departments that were excellent, such as the Parks Department and the Tax Department.

Alderman Steve Ponto was last to give his 3 minute intro. He stated he believed in limited government and disagreed with Obama. He said, just because government can pass a law doesn't mean it should. He said he would be a leader on policy issues, in the metropolitan area and preserve our interests with Wisconsin. He concluded with, single family neighborhoods are the hallmark of Brookfield. I am convinced I can do better.

During the 1st question on the interchange, Ponto pointed out no one was for it right now, but that the 2035 Plan called for a study that included the option of doing nothing. He asked if improvements could be made to existing interchanges or maybe a new ramp to Executive Drive. Ponto favored the study with no preconceptions.

Regarding raising taxes or cutting services, Ponto said our greatest concern was the removal of the QEO for the school district. The City comprising 29% of our tax bill while Elmbrook takes 56%. (The city usually takes all the blame for high taxes.)

Was there a candidate that jumped out at me as "the one"? No. There are red flags with all 3 for me. I don't think I am alone in my quandary over which one to vote for; a number of people have expressed their reservations to me about this election. Hopefully the other forums and Q&As on BrookfieldNOW's Mayoral Coverage Page will help me decide before February 16th's primary.

Unfortunately, the candidate I would have like to have seen run, didn't. I might just write her in! (...and it is not Cindy Kilkenny, although if she was on the ballot, I could be more enthused this election.)



Elmbrook School Board At Large Candidate Forum: Tuesday, February 2, 7pm, sponsored by the Elmbrook Parent Leadership Council Forum is at the Central Administrative Offices at 13780 Hope Street in Brookfield.

School Board Member Glen Allgaier has my ENTHUSIASTIC support for his Area II race.

Posts from the past: Mayoral Q&A a success and a surprise!
Mayoral Candidate invited 3 times to join in but declines to answer questions with Kilkenny

Links: 

counter hit xanga

Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, BetterBrookfield, Vicki McKenna, Jay Weber, The Right View Wisconsin, Randy Melchert, Mark Levin, The Heritage Foundation, CNS News, Breitbart BigGovernment

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. "It is pretty clear LB is not interested in an exchange of ideas".

    When I read that and considering the source, I fell off my chair laughing. That quote comes from someone who cites a religious cite whose premise in it arguments is wholly circular: the bible is true and historically correct because it is the bible. Then it tries to build on this premise by saying that since science does not have all the answers the bible must be correct.
  2. As for carbon dating, it has its flaws because of the assumptions evolutionists make regarding the rates of decay and carbon- 14's source.

    http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible
    "An alternative interpretation of the carbon-14 data is that the earth experienced a global flood catastrophe which laid down most of the rock strata and fossils.... Whatever the source of the carbon-14, its presence in nearly every sample tested worldwide is a strong challenge to an ancient age. Carbon-14 data is now firmly on the side of the young-earth view of history."
  3. It is pretty clear LB is not interested in an exchange of ideas.

    But for clarification for someone who really might want to know, I thought Lord Brookfield was speaking of the geologic column/fossil record when he cited "geology" as reason for proving evolution and an old earth.

    Evolutionists date fossils by the layer of rock they are found in and then date the layer of rock by the fossils found there. That is circular reasoning.
  4. Boy, did I have you pegged wrong and I apologize. You are not some draconian republican just spewing the far right wing party line, but you in truth are of the religious right a dying arm of the republican party. RIP.
  5. Geology is circular reasoning? On what facts do you base that opinion? Is it because the bible has to use an abbreviated timeline to fit in events and history of the earth?

    Carbon dating is inaccurate? is this because items had been dated as older than 6000 years or because it debunks the Shroud of Turin claims.

    Is Physics or Chemistry circular and flawed too? Is science just some vast conspiracy to discredit the Bible's word?

    Are you kidding me? Because genisis states god created land animals on the 6th day he thus created dinosaurs? Because Job uses a word that is translated to behemoth, means dinosaurs were accounted for?

    I think someone is applying a little bit of her own circular reasoning. Isnt the Bible flawed and inaccurate? Arent you using cicular reasoning to try to prove the bible is historical fact. Let me see if I understand your position. Because the book of genesis or any other portion of the bible says something is so, this means it is historical fact? Do you even know where the bible myths/stories come from? Arent you a student of history?
  6. Lord Brookfield,
    Geology (circular reasoning) and Carbon Dating (inaccurate) have their flaws.

    I don't know where you got the idea that Christians don't believe there were dinosaurs. Creationists believe they were made on day 6.

    The Bible does mention animals that resemble dinosaurs in the book of Job. (The word dinosaur, meaning terrible, monstrous + lizard, was "coined" in 1841.)

    http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/behemoth.asp

    If you are really interested, you might want to read The Great Dinosaur Mystery by Ken Ham http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/product/Great-Dinosaur-Mystery-Solved-The,4481,224.aspx
  7. Who are these blessed servant's of God who "often ask, what is with those people who write those awful comments"?

    I know, they are the ones who followed Jerry Falwell and now Pat Robertson, that sage of wisdom and tolerance.

    Had to comment, of cousre the earth is only 6000 years old, the bible says so. Geology and carbon dating are simply theories and easily discredited. I always wondered how come the bible makes no mention of dinosaurs? I know, their existence is just a theory too or a vast atheistic conspiacy.
  8. Kyle...first you say you want to be on topic and then you veer off by ripping people who make comments who point out their disagreement with your views. They are not awful comments...they just disagree with what you feel is the truth. Trust me...there are a lot of people who know the universe is older then 6000 years old and it makes them wonder from where your other views are influenced when they know you believe that kind of stuff. It always seems the people with the most conservative views are the most offended and least tolerant of input from others....why is that ?
  9. Hey, just feel blessed. Recently I read an article from some paper in California that was discussing their school's 3K program! Good grief, is it possible to conduct a prenatal program for the kids in which the mother is not present? If not, that would definitely establish a 'low end' to these programs!

    By the way, I found Shellinger's recent home delivered blurb to be quite interesting. He's got some specifics in there which definitely separate him from the gang of three who spoke at the forum.

    He may end up the sleeper!
  10. Thanks for bringing us back to the actual subject of my posting, Santa's Elf, the mayor's race. I found the poll on possible primary election survivors interesting as well.

    Yes, Cindy, it would be nice to hear from some other people. I know they are out there because I hear from them privately. They often ask, what is with those people who write those awful comments? I just say they are trying to discourage or discredit me. (They don't know me very well.)
Load more comments View all comments Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement