NOW:53045:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
12°
H 14° L 3°
Clear | 17MPH

Brookfield Basics

A column about history, culture, policy, and things in between.

Technology and Our Kids

"Technology is eradicating the wisdom of antiquity and slowly destroying our kids' ability to think".


Wow - what kind of reactionary Luddite crawled out from under a rock and gave voice to that mouthful?  Was it a joint communique issued by the firm of Belling, Beck and Limbaugh?  


No - they are the words of a noted anthropologist, writer, and educator that I had the pleasure of hearing at a two day conference in November.  He is not some myopic reactionary on the far right of contemprorary pubilc policy.  He is a brilliant, perceptive, articulate, politically liberal individual who travels the country speaking at conferences, schools, universities, and business enterprises.  Fifteen minutes with him and you will walk away with an awful lot to think about.  I had two days.


I have written more than once of the insidious impact our technology is having upon the fabric of our culture and the psyches of our young people.  I believe it is fair to say that the staggering array of technology we have before us, and its heretofore unimagined portability, has expanded far more rapidly than our willingness to evaluate the implications of that expansion.


I will start with some appropriate disclaimer - I enjoy and use technology and so do our kids.  The ability to locate and obtain information on any subject imaginable at the push of a button is extraordinarily efficacious.  In particular for me, the digitilization of music and the ability to carry thousands of songs around in my pocket has enriched my daily life.  Even as I write this article I am listening to a fabulous band called The Strokes on the streaming Internet music site Pandora.


You may think the speaker exaggerates - fair enough.  But I note the growing body of evidence and work from sociologists and psychologists who are identifying what they openly refer to as "electronic addiction".   Devices not much larger than a book of matches now carry more computing and communication power than early desk-tops.  And all too often they become not just tools in the hands of our young people, but virtual electronic appendages they can hardly seem to function without.  And it's not just an addiction that is unique to young people.  The now ubiquitous BlackBerry is referred to as the "CrackBerry", for its capacity to addict those who use them.


Technology is morally neutral, unto itself it is neither good nor bad.  It is a tool no different than a car or a refrigerator, designed to enhance and improve our lives, and there can be little question it does both.  But the AMOUNT that we use it, the PLACE it holds in our lives, is very much of an issue.  


My life is not nearly interesting enough to warrant constant updates to a band of electronic voyeurs - and I don't know anyone whose life is.  And I am convinced that the onset of technology is stunting our kids' interest in and ability to engage things more wholesome and edifying than staring at a shimmering green screen that calls to them like some modern day, Siren-song mirage. 


The defining difference between young people and geezers like me is that we now see a generation emerging that has never known life WITHOUT these devices and capabilities.  I know too many kids who are all but losing the ability to entertain themselves without them.  I know too many families with stories of kids taking their phones to bed, texting and surfing well into the night;  awaking stilted, tired, and unready to face the day.  I know of too many cases where alarmed parents have confiscated such devices, only to find their kids all but bereft and disaffected without them.


The onset of childhood obesity has been simultaneous to this explosion of technology.  I don't suggest it is the only cause, nor perhaps even the primary one.  But neither do I believe it is coincidence.  When technology begins to limit and stunt the ability of our youth to look outside of themselves, to interact with and engage people and ideas without the use of their contraptions, when they eliminate more wholesome and edifying activities from their routines, when the thought of going for a walk or listening to what Mother Nature has to say as opposed to the latest text message is utterly foreign to them, then this should give us pause. 


Think about it.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. Me thinks the malady to which Ms. Wilson alludes is that of Post Modernism. Part of this embodies a distrust of the scientific method, and the embracing of the all important 'me'.

    Until we give those who proceeded us in this life the respect and trust they deserve, we can never assess their errors for what they really are, and collectively correct and build on them.
  2. Excellent points, Tom. Another factor that “limit(s) and stunt(s) the ability of our youth to look outside of themselves” is an excess of educational progressivism. Instead of passing on the collected knowledge of a society, progressivism asks students to figure things out for themselves--maybe as part of a small group. Students choose their own books, invent their own mathematics, and write about themselves rather than about ideas.

    To be sure, progressive methods should be part of any teacher’s repertoire, but not to the point of edging out robust subject matter content. “Writing strategies,” “21st century skills,” “critical thinking,” and “conceptual understanding” form a hollow shell unless students also experience great literature, compose essays that discuss significant ideas, and memorize math facts and learn to perform fluent calculations.
  3. You are right on Tom. My parents and the others limited us to no radio, no phone calls and no comic books until the homework was done and inspected by them.
Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement