NOW:53045:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
12°
H 14° L 3°
Clear | 16MPH

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers' perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

Will parents opt kids out of Pres. Obama's national school address?

Culture, Education, President Obama

What goes on inside the walls of public schools used to be considered a local responsibility. Like almost everything else in our society, the creep towards Federal interference is becoming more like a leap.

Next week Tuesday, the president will address all public school students in a video address. He is to urge students to work hard, set goals, and be responsible for their education, something the teacher no doubt already told them on the first day, in the first 5 minutes of class.

The pep talk seems harmless enough. It's the other activities scheduled that day that are more troubling: Editorial: Beaming Obama into your kid's head, The president expands his cult into the classroom:

"But there is more to this noontime event than simply interrupting lunch. The Obama administration has recommended a series of activities before, during and after the speech intended to drill home the president's messages. Given that the teachers' unions are some of Mr. Obama's most ardent supporters, we expect that the supporting activities will have the feel of pro-Obama pep rallies".
 

"In a move suggestive of the Pyongyang public school system [in North Korea], the U.S. Department of Education recommended that before the speech students collectively brainstorm questions like, 'Why does President Obama want to speak with us today? How will he inspire us?' [A leading question that assumes the president inspired the student.] Classrooms are to be festooned with 'notable quotes excerpted (and posted in large print on board) from President Obama's speeches about education,' presumably alongside benevolent-looking images of the dear leader."

All of this is an attempt to "increase retention and deepen their understanding..." of what? Love for their president?

And let's not forget that in President Obama's younger years, he was chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, "Under Mr. Obama's leadership, the group funneled $100 million to left-wing activists to promote a radical political agenda under the guise of education reform"

Evidently I am not the only one finding this nationwide address troubling. The White House has already backed off of some of their instructive language to schools:

"President Obama's plan to inspire the nation's schoolchildren with a video address next week erupted into controversy Wednesday, forcing the White House to pull out its eraser and rewrite a government recommendation that teachers nationwide assign students a paper on how to 'help the president.'"

Pre-K to 6th grade students were to have written "letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president." Can someone tell me why this was all about helping the president and not about doing the best I can in school? (That was a rhetorical question.)

Actually, doing their best became the theme of the revised question. But what does the original question tell us about the goals of our president? Seems to be all about him to me.

Usually nothing much happens on the first day of school, but other school districts, such as Elmbrook's, have already started school. Either way I would think teachers have their lesson plans made and aren't too thrilled about this intrusion. It is just another distraction from real education time.

If I had a child in public school, I would probably try to find out just when this all was to transpire and consider an opt out of these special activities or leave before the broadcast? But that is just me; I opted out of public school altogether for my child.

When it comes to mixing children and presidential adoration, I still can't get the image of those children singing Yes we can, can, can, can out of my mind. Hopefully there won't be a music enrichment suggestion in Tuesday's curriculum!

Links: 

counter hit xanga

Brookfield7, Fairly Conservative, BetterBrookfield, Vicki McKenna, Jay Weber, The Right View Wisconsin, Randy Melchert, Mark Levin, The Heritage Foundation, CNS News

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. Ms. Practical Prast is being mean to Tarzan. Please press the "report abuse" button.
  2. Hey Tarzan, your comment, "None of you able to survive night in jungle. All afraid of imaginary things," was pretty funny considering you live in an imaginary world! ;-)
  3. Interesting theory, but alas I am not Tarzan and do not know who he is.

    Thank god, however, that the republican idealogues saved us from the orwellian democrats brainwashing our children. Kudos to you.
  4. It's the subliminal messages Obama will be sending that you should be worried about. I heard he will be holding his left arm slightly higher then his right signaling the dominance of the left over the right. All children should be kept at home that day. Perhaps this would be a good day to take the children to the doctor for non socialistic health care.
  5. I think Lord Brookfield knows Tarzan. You do draw out some interesting characters, though, Kyle. iloveyou sounds like she has a very long swan-type neck if you ask me. I'd suggest caution when engaging. You might end up debearded.

    Day two without hearing a thing from my kid's Elmbrook school on the subject. And I asked! Keeping the parents informed, and all that.
  6. mrswd, congratulations on passing that correspondence course in psychology. Will wd now allow you out alone so that you can meet other non-maoist like Kyle? Must be scary huh?
  7. iloveyou, how is it I willingly subject myself and my child to 2,500+ marketing messages EACH DAY?

    You are also assuming that encouraging students will be the only topic of discussion.
  8. You willingly subject yourself and your children to 2500+ marketing messages EACH DAY. And, this is what's 'gettin' your goat'?! God forbid he encourage students in schools or provide them with an opportunity to discuss with their classmates.
  9. Good grief. Paranoid much?
  10. Tarzan and Jane have Boy. Know plenty about home school and raising kids.

    None of you able to survive night in jungle. All afraid of imaginary things.

    Boo!
Load more comments View all comments Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement