NOW:53045:USA01489
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01489
39°
H 39° L 27°
Cloudy | 12MPH

Practically Speaking

Kyle and her husband moved to Brookfield in 1986. She became active in local politics and started blogging in 2004. Her focus is primarily on local issues but often includes state and national topics, too. Kyle looks at things from the taxpayers' perspective in a creative, yet down to earth way, addressing them from a practical point of view.

Why Newt? He dishes it back. Why not Newt? Because....

2012, President Obama, Politics, Elections

Newt Gingrich shocked many 2012 election watchers by winning South Carolina's primary on Saturday. South Carolina. Newt won conservative South Carolina, big time!

Despite very negative allegations by X-wife #2 the very week leading up to the primary, Newt still managed to surge ahead to capture 41% of the vote to Romney's 27%, Santorum's 17% and Paul's 13%. In exit polls, Newt even won over the Evangelical and Tea Party voters. How was that possible?

Now, I am no Romney fan (because of RomneyCare and my preference for a mainstream Christian), but at least I felt Romney was a somewhat acceptable default candidate for Republicans--he may not be a conservative with passion, but he would go along with a conservative led Congress. Hands down, Ron Paul is my most undesirable choice. But next to Paul, Newt would be my least desirable candidate of the roster--even when there were still 9 in the running!*

That said, I do love the way Newt dishes it back to the media, and I think that is why Newt manages to evoke a positive response--even with conservatives. He really nailed it on the head at the CNN debate, " 'I am tired of the elite media protecting Barack Obama by attacking Republicans,' he said."

And he is right about the media keeping good candidates out of the mix when he fumed, "The destructive, vicious, negative nature of much of the news media makes it harder to govern this country, harder to attract decent people to run for public office..." Just look at how they have gone after Rick Santorum with questions about his wife and even his stillborn son. Or the relentless attacks on Sarah Palin and her family. Is it any wonder good people like Gov. Bobby Jindal or Rep. Paul Ryan shy away from running?

Dishing it back is the same reason people responded to Donald Trump. While I don't believe for a minute that he is a conservative, and I think he and Newt have similar problems with the women in their lives, I did enjoy his boldly responding to reporters questions and tying it back to Obama, who has been abysmal as a president.

Sarah Palin should have been a natural for running in 2012. After all, it was McCain's selection of her that brought some spark into his campaign. But the media so mercilessly attacked her and her family, they pretty much guaranteed her staying out this time.

Since I started writing this post, the 4 remaining candidates had their first debate in Florida. This time, Newt didn't knock it out of the park. While I can appreciate Newt's bold rhetoric, he is NO conservative. He has been all over the map on the issues--even in recent years--supporting the individual mandate for health insurance, supporting Cap and Tax with Nancy Pelosi, and supporting pathways to citizenship for illegals.

So as Newt and Mitt continue to bloody each other and Ron Paul is just, well, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum stands firm. They all have their flaws, but Rick Santorum to me has the least baggage and will protect American's Right to Rise. (If you agree, Santorum could use your help: ricksantorum.com)

We aren't just hiring someone who can throw a punch at the press or be good at debating. We are selecting a President, and the contrasts are clear. Look at the man and his record. The goal is defeating President Obama and his oppressive socialist agenda in 2012, not trading jabs at a debate.

Wall Street Journal 2012 Election Delegate Tracker


Romney, Gingrich trade barbs in Tampa debate.

Oops, Nancy Pelosi On A Gingrich Presidency: "That Will Never Happen"

Krauthammer: Santorum Can Hang Around If He Keeps Finishing Third

*Any one of those 9 Republicans would be a far better choice than what we have now. To loosely quote conservative talk show host Mark Levin, I would vote for an orange juice can over Obama. I agree.

COMMENT POLICY

This is not the place for gossip, sniping at other bloggers, commentors, races, or religions, etc.

There is no need to berate another just because they don't share your viewpoint.

All comments not respectfully discussing the blog topic or incessantly making virtually the same point are going into delete world.

Those of you double or triple posting under multiple names, stop it!

Keep this in mind on future posts because the NOW blog comment policy will be enforced.

For the most part, I will not enter the comment forum, so if you have a question for me, contact me via email: practicallyspeaking@gmail.com

Links: 

counter hit xanga

Brookfield7Fairly ConservativeRandy Melchert, BetterBrookfield, Vicki McKenna, Jay WeberMark Levin,The Heritage Foundation, CNS News, Breitbart BigGovernment

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can register through your Facebook account, sign on with your Facebook password and use the same photo and screen name. If you don’t want your account tied to Facebook, you can keep your registration through our site.
  • You can now personalize your Journal Sentinel account with a photo even if the account is not tied to Facebook.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
  1. Vlad should be impaled! Newt is the smartest man running, but he's got more baggage than JFK. Palin was muzzled by McCain and he lost the election because he is an old goat just like Bob Dole. That's the GOP establishment for you. The support candidates whose "time has come", and they certainly don't support true conservatism. You judge Kyle and tell HER not to be judgmental? Have you got a screw loose? Romney doesn't have any common sense if he believes (and he does) the drivel that the Mormons teach. It's so stupid that it's hard to believe anyone would believe that the Book of Mormon (is there one too many m's in there?) would be the truth when it basically undermines everything in the Bible. That would make God two-faced and that just ain't so! If Romney the RINO is the candidate I'm staying home on election day!
    Hide replies
  2. Why not Newt? Because he will lose the election for the Republicans just like Sarah Palin lost the last election for the Republicans.

    Why do you persist in supporting losers, being so judgemental (Rommney's faith) and censoring reader comments?
  3. Deleting comments again even though they are accurate. Shame shame.

    You can see the bigotry for yourself by reading the 5/18/11 post.
  4. I don't think voters realize that the president is supposed to be able to do only so much. Obama has usurped power at every turn and the wimps in Congress have let him do it. The very fact that he's not eligible to serve is ignored by the donkeys and the RINOs. This should be a very big issue during the campaign, but everyone seems to be afraid of offending the GOP establishment...which I despise almost as much as the donkeys. Almost...I said!
  5. Padraig - I'll join you and your wife in exile if Santorum wins! Perhaps we could go 50/50 on local housing. Ever watch "House Hunters - International"? Unfortunately, you'll also have to out up with my baggage...namely, my children, their spouses and my grandchildren. I, like you, assure you this is no joke!

    Santorum = "we're out of here"!
  6. Newt poured a ton of money into advertising prior to the debate. His rich buddy from Texas funded lots of the advertising. Power of the Press so to speak. Santorum has some heavy baggage with his thoughts on abortion. Some recent pols telling the fact that almost 1/3 of the conservative right would like some different blood to look at. I agree with that also. Gingrich is worse than Obama and Clinton put together.
  7. Romney is the only Republican remaining for whom I would consider casting my vote. I've already shared with my wife, and she has agreed, that we're moving out of the country if Santorum becomes president. I wasn't kidding when I told her that, and she knew immediately that I wasn't.
  8. Kyle, what's so good about winning South Carolina? After all Jeff Davis did it in 1861 just after they'd kicked Lincoln off their ticket.

    Then there's Paul. What's wrong with him?

    He's a good conservative who wants to actually follow the Constitution, all but eliminate most Federal government, end the phony money, bring our kids back home before they end up in bags, quit making war - where ever possible, and allow people to run their own lives.

    Is that more scary than presidents ruling by Executive Order, FEMA camps, troops practicing martial law in our big cities, and no clear plan to accomplishing anything constructive?

    Newt is what you get when you give a pickle a PhD!

    At least he doesn't need cue cards to remember his policy.

    Nap time!
Back to top

Page Tools

  • Share

advertisement